NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Sunday, March 09, 2008
Austin Hill :: Townhall.com Columnist
McCain, Republicans, and "Global Warming"
by Austin Hill
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
How did you find out about WGKA?





Think you can sidestep the issue of “global warming,” simply by voting Republican?

Think again.

Now that Senator John McCain is officially the Republican nominee for President, global warming is, whether anyone likes it or not, an “issue” for both of our nation’s dominant political parties. McCain has been gravitating towards this issue for several years, and made his mark with it during his chairing of the U.S. Senate hearings on global warming back in 2004.

Today, Mr. McCain articulates a position on the matter that is far more moderate and reasonable, and far more hospitable to our free market economy, than those of his two Democratic competitors. The question remains whether or not American voters, Republican voters in particular, will embrace McCain’s vision.

Before examining anybody’s policy proposals, it’s important to get a handle on just what, precisely, is the issue. And by now, it’s like that most thoughtful Americans have at a minimum been introduced to the idea that the earth’s average temperature is on the rise, and that this is a bad thing, and that this bad thing is brought about by human activity.

But beyond this starting point, the issue quickly devolves into a process of sorting out the “believers” from the “non-believers.” Either you believe that the global temperature is rising, or you don’t; and you either believe that the increase in temperature is brought about by human activity, or by the processes of nature itself; and you either believe that the rise in temperature will bring about destruction and calamity, or that it will not.

Former Vice President Al Gore is, of course, the leader of the “true believers.” On his personal website he states with absolute certainty what this alleged “problem” entails:

Carbon dioxide and other gases warm the surface of the planet naturally by trapping solar heat in the atmosphere. This is a good thing because it keeps our planet habitable. However, by burning fossil fuels such as coal, gas and oil and clearing forests we have dramatically increased the amount of carbon dioxide in the Earth’s atmosphere and temperatures are rising.

But as Mr. Gore states the problem with certainty - - the earth’s temperatures are rising, and this rise is caused by human’s consumption of fossil fuels - - he ignores several details that detract from his strongly asserted “beliefs.”

It is true that the average global temperature has risen slightly (approximately 0.6% over the past century); and it is also true that the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has risen during this same period of time. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Austin Hill is a Talk Show Host for the Fox Newstalk Radio Network, and a frequent guest host for 630 WMAL / Washington D.C. and 1080 KRLD/Dallas. He is the author of "White House Confidential: The Little Book Of Weird Presidential History," and is a local columnist for Arizona's East Valley Tribune Newspaper.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: to the rescue: trevor
In your insane need to discredit science and prove, finally, that oil companies and automobile manufactures are good people that wouldn't hurt anyone and want to help everyone (while scientists are evil money grabbers doing anything they can to get grant money), you there is a new face, to ignore all the nagging questions about dead body carbon sequestering and the wonderful climate of the Jurassic Period.

Nice to meet you. Do you know my good friend Karl Rove, he works at Fox. And Philip A. Cooney, who works as an oil industry lobbyist --no, dang it, he's the chief of staff for the White House Council on Environmental Quality.

Did you get that -- Environmental Quality!

He's the one that reviews the scientific reports to make sure there's real doubt about any thing that might hurt profits for the oil companies. A good guy.

Well, we will see won't we.

I don't know all the answers. But if there is permanent damage being done to our world, if the tundra starts oxydizing, because of the greenhouse gases, if the mined carbon starts to create big environmental disasters we will see.

I don't doubt there is a technical solution, but that's why we need science. Maybe, right now our government is spraying aerosols in the high atmosphere to prevent solar flux. Maybe they will solve the problem that way.

But to make Science the enemy, so the public is fearful and sheeplike, that is really wrong.

Global Warming, every 1,100 years
As others have pointed out, this is not the first time temperatures have increased. It has happened three other times just in the last 4,000 years. Paleoclimatologists have labeled these periods: The Minoan Warm Period (about 3,300 years ago), the Roman Warm Period (about 2,200 years ago), and the Medieval Warm Period (about 1,100 years ago). Temperatures were warmer in all three of these periods than the maximum temperatures seen during the current warm period, and they rose just as rapidly. So what caused it then? Well, it wasn't SUVs and coal-burning electricity plants, that's for dammed sure. Whatever it was, it was completely NATURAL.

So now, about 1,100 years after the last time, we have global warming again. An astute observer will notice that this falls right in line with the cycle defined by the previous three warm periods. Why in the world is it necessary to blame mankind for this warming? I'll tell you why! Because climatologists want more grant money, politicians want more power, environmentalists want to destroy capitalism, and the mainstream media is in bed with all three of them.

One more fact. We have documented historical evidence, from people who lived in those times, that the Roman and Medieval Warm Periods were quite prosperous for mankind. Higher birth rates; lower death rates; longer life expectancy; higher agricultural yields; more abundant numbers of most plant and animal species. All of this, with temperatures a degree or two higher than they are now! Though few historical documents have survived from the Minoan Warm Period, there is archaeological evidence that it too was quite prosperous for mankind.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!