NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Thursday, March 20, 2008
Brian Fitzpatrick :: Townhall.com Columnist
ABC’s Raddatz Recoils from True Political Leadership
by Brian Fitzpatrick
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
How did you find out about WGKA?





“So?” It may become the word that defines Dick Cheney.

Much to the chagrin of ABC’s Martha Raddatz, Vice President Richard Cheney dismissed the importance of an ABC poll finding that two thirds of Americans think the Iraq war “was not worth fighting.”

Every election cycle we hear politicians claim they make decisions according to their core principles and judgment about what’s best for the country, not according to the latest opinion polls. Apparently Raddatz doesn’t place much value on independent, principled thinking in politicians, at least in relation to a war despised by the liberal media.

Media coverage of the Iraq war has been skeptical and often hostile to the U.S. effort for the full five years of the conflict, as documented by MRC’s Rich Noyes.

Interviewing Cheney in Oman on Wednesday, March 19, the fifth anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, Raddatz advanced the ABC poll findings apparently to suggest that the U.S. should withdraw from the country.

Cheney responded by pointing out the “fundamental change and transformation and improvement” in Iraq, and gently tweaking the correspondent: “I think even you would admit that.”

Raddatz quickly got away from the progress in Iraq, pointing back to the poll findings and arguing that Americans oppose the war because its costs outweigh its benefits. Cheney, perhaps thinking that the media routinely inform the public about the war’s costs but rarely the benefits, responded with a single word: “So?”

Raddatz responded, “So? You don’t care what the American people think?”

Cheney drove it home: “No, I think you cannot be blown off course by the fluctuations in the public opinion polls.”

Network news coverage of the fifth anniversary of the Iraq invasion, March 19, emphasized the financial and human cost of the war, but said nothing of the benefits. CBS’s Katie Couric reported the U.S. casualty figures, nearly 4,000 dead and more than 29,000 wounded, and CBS interviewed the families of several fallen U.S. soldiers. NBC’s Jim Miklaszewski pointed out that the war has cost $600 billion, or 10 times the original estimate. ABC reported that 80,000 Iraqi civilians have died (no mention of how many of these, probably the vast majority, were killed by al Qaeda and its allies) and interviewed three Iraqis whose lives have been disrupted by the war.

The nets also acknowledged that conditions have improved in Iraq, with NBC’s Richard Engel reporting that the number of guerrilla attacks dropping from a peak of 210 a day in February 2007 to just 65 a day this month. However, not a single network news program mentioned any benefit, short term or long term, the war may be providing to the United States, Iraq, or the world.

Here’s the full transcript of ABC’s interview with Cheney.

Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Brian Fitzpatrick, a writer, editor, and commentator on political and cultural issues, is the Senior Editor at Media Research Center’s Culture & Media Institute.

Be the first to read Brian Fitzpatrick's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Subject: Adam Smith weighs in...
All you "Warriors," please ask yourself objectively, does this apply to you: "In great empires the people who live in the capital, and in the provinces remote from the scene of action, feel, many of them, scarce any inconveniency from the war; but enjoy, at their ease, the amusement of reading in the newspapers the exploits of their own fleets and armies. To them this amusement compensates the small difference between the taxes which they pay on account of the war, and those which they had been accustomed to pay in time of peace. They are commonly dissatisfied with the return of peace, which puts an end to their amusement, and to a thousand visionary hopes of conquest and national glory from a longer continuance of the war."
-"An Inquiry into the Nature And Causes of the Wealth of Nations" (http://www.adamsmith.org/smith/won-b5-c3-ss3.htm)

Peace be with you.

More 'Principles'
Fourth, Mr. Fitzpatrick: "ABC reported that 80,000 Iraqi civilians have died (no mention of how many of these, probably the vast majority, were killed by al Qaeda and its allies). "Probably the vast majority?" Impressive...on what basis do you make that claim? Sources? That's some REAL journalistic integrity, coming from someone complaining about other people's 'agendas.'
Finally, again, Mr. Fitpatrick: "The nets also acknowledged that conditions have improved in Iraq, with NBC’s Richard Engel reporting that the number of guerrilla attacks dropping from a peak of 210 a day in February 2007 to just 65 a day this month." Did you twitch, even a little bit, when you typed the words 'just' 65 guerrilla attacks a day. You're like a lousy car salesman: "Don't look at it as 23,700 guerrilla attacks a year, look at it as 'just' 65 a day. It's really a bargain!"
Peace be with you.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*