On Monday, the Supreme Court refused to take up the appeal lodged by
environmental groups that focused on a two-mile stretch of border fence in
the San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area near Naco, Ariz. The
fence, which has been built since the petition was filed, is a vital part of
the Bush administration's drive to secure the border between the United
States and Mexico. The Supreme Court's decision is a welcome and needed
victory in the war against illegal immigration and efforts to preserve the
unique character that is America.
The environmentalists based part of their challenge on claims the fence
would harm the mating habits of two types of wildcats. To them, it is more
important to allow wildcats to procreate than to control our borders and
demand that everyone who comes here obey our laws. We must obey their laws. Google "Driving in Mexico" and see all of
the paperwork that is required to enter that country. An illegal stopped in
America often goes free because too many in law enforcement either can't or
won't enforce federal law.
Time magazine's June 30 cover story is titled "The Great Wall of America: A
billion-dollar barrier between the U.S. and Mexico. It's reducing illegal
immigration - but does America really need to wall itself off?"
This isn't about walling ourselves off. This isn't a Berlin Wall erected to
keep people in. It is a fence designed to keep illegals out. Anyone who
doesn't understand the difference will not be persuaded by facts.
This fence and other inhibitors to illegal immigration should have been
built long ago. But politicians - Republicans and Democrats - have been
reluctant to offend Hispanic voters, so they have dragged their feet.
Democrats, especially, wish to import votes and so they welcome illegals and
seek to help them become citizens. Their message: vote for Democrats, or
your relatives won't be able to come and mean Republicans will try to throw
you out. It's a twist on their demagoguery about Social Security, which has
worked for them over many election cycles.
In a book to be published July 7 entitled "The New Case Against Immigration:
Both Legal and Illegal," Mark Krikorian argues that the real problem with
all immigrants is not them, but us. Unlike immigrants who have come before
and were expected to assimilate, learn English and embrace American history
and culture, today's immigrants come to an America characterized by identity
politics, political correctness and Great Society programs. As a result, he
writes, too many are encouraged - through the Internet and cheap
international phone service - to lead "transnational lives," thus foiling
the best efforts to make them part of us, rather than half and hyphenated
Americans who remain strongly tied to their countries of origin.
Krikorian wants a lengthy pause in all immigration, legal and illegal, in
order to focus on making Americans out of those already here. "As the
politicians debate various kinds of amnesty for illegal aliens," he writes,
"they are missing the bigger picture: the harmful impact of large-scale
settlement of all kinds of immigrants, whether legal or illegal, skilled or
unskilled, European or Latin or Asian or African. Modern America has simply
outgrown immigration and we must end it before it cripples us."
Krikorian is a grandson of Armenian immigrants and he says America is not
the country it was when his grandfather arrived. If we don't change, he
says, it won't be a country worth handing over to future generations.
No nation can preserve itself, its identity and nature, if it refuses to
control its borders. The recent Supreme Court decision is a good first step,
but it should not be the last. Few politicians have the courage to say what
needs to be said and do what needs to be done. President Bush waited until
his last year in office to begin to get serious about stopping illegals, and
Republicans generally seek to avoid controversy so it doesn't appear the GOP
will be much help.
As for Democrats, why should they stop importing their best hope for future
electoral victories? The public is going to have to rise up and demand that
more be done. |