NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
Patrick J. Buchanan :: Townhall.com Columnist
How the West Lost the World
by Patrick J. Buchanan
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
How did you find out about WGKA?





Europe, the Mother Continent of Western Man, is today aging and dying, unable to sustain the birth rates needed to keep her alive, or to resist conquest by an immigrant invasion from the Third World.

What happened to the nations that only a century ago ruled the world?

In "Churchill, Hitler and 'The Unnecessary War': How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World," published today, this writer will argue that it was colossal blunders of British statesmen, Winston Churchill foremost among them, that turned two European wars into world wars that may yet prove the mortal wounds of the West.

The first blunder was a secret decision of the inner Cabinet in 1906 to send a British army across the Channel to fight in any Franco-German War. Had the Kaiser known the British Empire would fight for France, he would have moved more decisively than he did to halt the plunge to war in July 1914.

Had Britain not declared war on Aug. 4 and brought in Japan, Italy and the United States, the war would have ended far sooner. Leninism and Stalinism would never have triumphed in Russia, and Hitler would never have come to power in Germany.

The second blunder was the vengeful Treaty of Versailles that added a million square miles to the British Empire while putting millions of Germans under Czech and Polish rule in violation of the terms of the armistice and Woodrow Wilson's 14 Points.

A third was the British decision to capitulate to U.S. demands in 1921 and throw over a faithful Japanese ally of 20 years. Tokyo took its revenge, 20 years later, by inflicting the greatest defeat in British history, the surrender of Singapore and an army of 80,000 to a Japanese army half that size.

A fourth British blunder, which Neville Chamberlain called the "very midsummer of madness," was the 1935 decision to sanction Italy for a colonial war in Ethiopia. London destroyed the Stresa Front of Britain, France and Italy that Mussolini had forged to contain Germany, and drove Mussolini straight into the arms of a Nazi dictator he loathed.

In 1936, France sounded out the British to determine if they would support a drive to push German troops out of the Rhineland that Hitler had occupied in violation of Versailles. The British refused. And Churchill congratulated France for taking the matter up with the League of Nations, and said the ideal solution would be a voluntary Nazi withdrawal from the Rhineland to show the world that Hitler respected the sanctity of treaties.

Munich, 70 years ago this September, was a disaster. But it was a direct, if not inevitable, consequence of a Versailles treaty that had consigned 3.5 million Sudeten Germans to Czech rule against their will and in violation of the principle of self-determination.

But the fatal blunder was not Munich.

It was the decision of March 31, 1939, to hand a war guarantee to a neo-fascist regime of Polish colonels who had joined Hitler in the rape of Czechoslovakia. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Pat Buchanan is a founding editor of The American Conservative magazine, and the author of many books including State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America .
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Pat Buchanan's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Subject: Buchanon's Out There Again
Buchanon's strange interpretations of these historical events have little to do with with the current immigration problems which really are the issue of danger to the West.

Also, his interpretations seem to based on some flawed assumptions, and also lead to some conclusions that are not necessarily realistic.

Buchanon seems to assume, for example, that protecting Poland led to the war, and had Britain not done so, Germany would have quit invading it's neighbors and then proved to the world that it's plans, as laid out in
Mein Kamph, for domination of Russia and France was all just talk and they weren't really serious.

Also, as far as Churchill being behind the disaster of the Dardenelles campaign,
it was a well-conceived plan that failed because the general who led it was unfit for command. Churchill did not assign this general this task.

The Treaty of Versailles is already widely understood to have been a mistake, and that it contributed to the next war, so we didn't need Buchanon to remind us, and it has nothing to do with any present day threat anyway. Others paid the price for that that needed paying, so we need not worry now about it.

All in all, something about Buchanon's revisionist sense of history seems both irrelevant and un-American.

Welfare and Life
Europe was doing well in 1914 before WWI. The start of WWII was due to not ending WWI. We left the Germans able to rebuild and attack. Even at the end of WWII, Europe was still doing well and rebuilding despite the comments others have made above.

But then Europe turned to welfare. In Sweden and many other countries, over 90% of income is tax that goes to support welfare systems such as free child care, l