NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Ted Baehr :: Townhall.com Columnist
Reading Between the Frames
by Ted Baehr
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
How did you find out about WGKA?





The Motion Picture Association of America, which represents the six major movie studios in Hollywood and helps them beat their competition, was very excited this month about touting Hollywood's record-breaking year in 2007.

Figures released by the MPAA showed that worldwide box office totals increased 4.9 percent to $26.72 billion in 2007. In those totals, the domestic box office also set a record, increasing 5.4 percent to $9.629 billion.

These figures, however, do not reflect the underlying concern movie executives have in the overall decline in movie going in the United States. Total admissions in the United States and Canada increased only 0.3 percent in 2007, to 1.4 billion tickets sold. Also, that number represents a whopping 12 percent decline from Contemporary Hollywood's best year in 2002, when it sold 1.599 billion tickets.

Furthermore, the MPAA forgot to mention that annual movie admissions for the domestic box office in 2007 are still 29 percent below the 1.98 billion admissions in the middle 1960s, before the six major Hollywood studios' immoral ratings system (G, PG, PG-13, R and NC-17) came into being and alienated family audiences and mainstream moviegoers.

Considering that the population in the United States and Canada has increased from about 210 million people to more than 336 million people, the number of ticket sales in North America has continued to drop — nearly 56 percent — since 1966, from 9.43 tickets sold per person to only about 4.17 tickets sold per person annually.

The situation is even worse if you go back to 1946, the heyday of the Golden Age of Hollywood, when 55 percent of the American population, about 78 million people, went to the movies every week, for about 4 billion ticket sales. Today, only between 27 percent and 30 percent of the American people go to movies every week.

In other words, the amount of movie admissions today has declined 66 percent, or two-thirds, since the heights of the Golden Age, when "Mr. Smith [Went] To Washington" and when George Bailey learned that "It's A Wonderful Life."

In 1993, with the Movieguide Report to the Entertainment Industry, we began to how various kinds of movies have translated into sales. We have seen a dramatic increase in family films with traditional moral values based on the Bible, and many more movies with Christian content. Since then, annual ticket sales for Hollywood have increased 27.4 percent.

Furthermore, recent studies by us and other organizations, including The Nielsen Co., show G-rated movies with no sex, foul language, explicit nudity nor graphic violence make at least 3 to 5 times more money per movie at the box office than R-rated movies.

Thus, it has become ever clearer that, if Hollywood wants to make more money, it needs to ditch the cumbersome MPAA content ratings, stop making R-rated and NC-17 movies altogether, clean up the content of the remaining movies, and go back to the Code of Decency that fueled Hollywood's Golden Age from 1933 to 1966, when God and His values ruled the box office, instead of the values of senile hedonists like Hugh Hefner and angry radical atheists like Michael Moore. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Dr. Baehr is the founder and Publisher of Movieguide®: A Family Guide to Movies and Entertainment and Chairman of the Christian Film & Television Commission.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: Porn On the Brain
Dear Dr. Baehr:

When you take a stand against public displays of filth and perversion, you can expect many of the trollers you see above as a matter of course. And you see the same excuses:

1. "Just don't watch it."- Sure. Just try to avoid it or protect your children from it when it's everywhere.

2. "That's (gasp!) censorship."- Citizens and communities have the right to protect themselves and their families against material that promotes immoral and unlawful conduct. This principle was once universally recognized. The First Amendment was never intended to protect this as "free speech".

3. "It'll raise awareness of the issue."- This is the classic ploy of pornmongers. No "art" production was ever intended to do more than advance the profits and notoriety of its makers. Nor could it.

4. "This is not 1950."- No, it's not. In the '50s and early '60s, there was no ratings system. Anyone could attend a first-run film in a theater who was old enough to buy a ticket. As a child then, I did so frequently every Saturday morning. Until Jack Valenti came to Hollywood and legitimized what was before regarded (rightfully) as immoral and outright pornography, parents didn't have to worry about such things. Now they do- and from multiple venues- and to such an extent as was never dreamed possible.

Not only do we now see "entertainment" people degrading themselves before us for money (as in "prostitution"), but now and increasingly, these productions are aimed at children and include actual children in their making. And decent people are supposed to stand by and see their kids' souls polluted for Hollywood's sake? I don't think so.

45caliber
Moi aussi! One of my former brothers-in-law and his friends were kicked out of the original "Alien" movie for shouting "BLOW THE AIRLOCK" at the screen as soon as they knew the alien was aboard. Of cousre, 2 hours later when everyone but the girl was dead, that's just what she did.

My sister and I were escorted from a theatre showing of "Drivel", er, "Driven" in which methanol burned with a visible flame, cars stopped on an oval and reversed, as the drivers went into a pond to save someone who went off into the (flaming) pond, cars that had been wrecked five minutes before were back on the track in pristine condition, and Max Papis entered low earth orbit ("HEY, YOU GOT THE WINGS ON UPSIDE DOWN!" was the shout that got us turfed.)

There's suspension of disbelief and there's the idiot plot.

P.S. I am looking forward to the "Speed Racer" movie. Some poor girl in the Car Show was showing the trailer and trying to give the posters to kids, who didn't know Speed Racer from Sylvester Stallone. All the people grabbing the posters and avidly discussing the movie (the kid playing Speed Racer looks uncannily like his Anime original) were over 45.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asteri